Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:18:59 +0000
From:      Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
Message-ID:  <8948545b-5269-8a0e-3f92-9dfd02f227c1@gjunka.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED.02.03935.A361E495@dnvrco-omsmta01>
References:  <CAO%2BPfDeFz1JeSwU3f21Waz3nT2LTSDAvD%2B8MSPRCzgM_0pKGnA@mail.gmail.com> <20170622121856.haikphjpvr6ofxn3@ivaldir.net> <dahnkctsm1elbaqlarl8b9euouaplqk2tv@4ax.com> <20170622141644.yadxdubynuhzygcy@ivaldir.net> <4jrnkcpurfmojfdnglqg5f97sohcuv56sv@4ax.com> <20170622211126.GA6878@lonesome.com> <n8eokc5fafda8gedtvbhh7i0qdk83gur5q@4ax.com> <594C4663.5080209@quip.cz> <09384577-ed7e-d142-43f3-0a08f5d21056@freebsd.org> <5eabe1d2-85a3-f7eb-a1ab-dc5552eb70fe@gjunka.com> <fa33d0e8-67cb-ab06-9a58-26dafe250f6c@freebsd.org> <6d35f70b-17f2-d864-68ed-a3637cdc9fbf@gjunka.com> <63e5c4e30a60d51c5a068177b9483206@acheronmedia.hr> <ED.02.03935.A361E495@dnvrco-omsmta01>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>>> Fine. Considering that maintainers already apply patches to the latest
>>> quarterly branch. If there were to be OS version branches, it would
>>> mean that maintainers apart from what they are doing now would
>>> additionally need to apply selected patches to those OS version
>>> branches?
>> "OS version branches" would be a complete waste of time and resources, and it
>> would remove some level of separation/independence between the base and ports.
>> The crux of the problem here is so called "stable ports", not necessarily
>> tying them to the life cycle of a base release. It doesn't make sense to tie
>> version of a port to the base release. Especially with the new releng support
>> schedule that would mean 5 years per major version which is quite a lot.
> (snip)
>
> I personally can't see the rationale of many OS version branches of ports: far too much work.
>
> I had the thought of something like that for (NetBSD) pkgsrc: a very tall order, considering that pkgsrc has been ported to many OSes besides NetBSD.
>
> Imagine a separate branch of pkgsrc for every version and branch of NetBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, etc.
>
> I only follow the current branch of FreeBSD ports and pkgsrc, though now I have also become interested in pkgsrc-synth.
>
> Tom
>

Are there any advantages of using pkg instead of pkgsrc on FreeBSD?

Instead of having branches by OS version, would having ports LTS 
branches independent of the base system be a better solution?

Grzegorz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8948545b-5269-8a0e-3f92-9dfd02f227c1>