Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:39:36 -0400 From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> To: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> Cc: gballet@gmail.com, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Pandora Message-ID: <49EA3A88.8070702@telenix.org> In-Reply-To: <F2CD10F4-2EBA-447B-BB37-2F75B490A421@semihalf.com> References: <200904181942.n3IJg5Yi097493@casselton.net> <F2CD10F4-2EBA-447B-BB37-2F75B490A421@semihalf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > > On 2009-04-18, at 21:42, Mark Tinguely wrote: > >>> <my stuff removed> >>> OK, then, I'll hunt around for whatever I can find to compare the >>> armv6 with armv7. >> >> I just looked at the OMAP glossy doc even says : >> >> Fully Software-Compatible With C64x and ARM9. >> >> ARM9 is ARMv5. > > Hi Mark, > Just to clarify: older generations of OMAP were indeed ARMv5, but OMAP3 > (found on Beagle board) is Cortex-A8 i.e. v7, also the upcoming OMAP4 is > v7 as well (Cortex-A9, multicore). > Ahh, I didn't spot the OMAP/OMAP3 error, thanks for that (I didn't know about it, even if I'd have spotted it, of course). > Rafal > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEUEARECAAYFAknqOogACgkQz62J6PPcoOn3HACgnddCLqillSDCrmgR7bLQOjO6 q4QAmLMuut1Ho4Kg52KlG6aA17BOMEY= =8oUw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49EA3A88.8070702>