Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) From: fbsdmail@dnswatch.com To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible? Message-ID: <87e10af65ceb06031196097d7b8920f8.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <FE636132-7E89-4901-8A99-96C70D961D4F@mac.com> References: <2b2485288a6e492b3c5c94cc21c79949.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <FE636132-7E89-4901-8A99-96C70D961D4F@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, April 25, 2011 11:54 am, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 25, 2011, at 11:47 AM, fbsdmail@dnswatch.com wrote: > >> I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a gateway on this >> prefix (DSLmodem). >> I also have a /24 with a prefix of 75.160.109.xxx >> My question(s) is/are: >> 1) is it possible to route both of these across the same GW? >> > > If these netblocks were both owned by you directly and you have an ASN, > or if they're both owned by the same ISP who is willing to route them > that way, sure. Talk to Quest... I lease both, and have ASN's for both. My question is more; what might be a solution that /I/ might employ that would permit routing of both blocks across the single GW. I can envision creating a freebsd based gateway that is directly connected to the DSLmodem carrying an IP out of the 168 block, and one out of the 75 block that routes traffic for both /24's. But this consumes more IP's and creates an additional hop. Thanks for your reply. --Chris > > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87e10af65ceb06031196097d7b8920f8.dnswclient>