Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:32:16 -0500 From: "Daniel Domengeaux" <freebsd@supa-fly.org> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: OT: softupdates (was Re: df -k) Message-ID: <03d601c02f1c$2fa1da60$cd2710d1@comspace.com> References: <HLEDJBJKDDPDJBMGCLPPMEPBCEAA.otterr@telocity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> BUT... keeping in mind that the best thing about Unix-like OSes is > their flexibility, the free space can be changed. man tunefs for your > options, but remember that if you want more space, you'll get less > speed. You want more speed from tunefs? You get less space. > Personally, I'd recommend leaving it alone. Softupdates gives enough > of a performance boost without eating up disk space... just my two > cents. > -Otter i enabled softupdates a few days ago and have noticed a slight increase in performance but am just curious to know if anyone has any benchmarks actually showing the difference between having them enabled and not. -daniel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03d601c02f1c$2fa1da60$cd2710d1>