Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:51:28 +0200 From: Dennis Koegel <amf@hobbit.neveragain.de> To: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence Message-ID: <20041026065128.GA14982@neveragain.de> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEIKEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <20041025082051.GB16445@neveragain.de> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEIKEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:32:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Because Juniper, for example [...] > > You do realize, don't you, that the interesting part of a Juniper > is the microcode in their DSP routing engine. FreeBSD is only used > to control the routing engine in a Juniper router, it isn't used AS > the routing engine. Of course I do realize that. It was merely an example, apparently not the best one. It's their choice to do or don't, that's all I said. (For terminology: The i386 part with FreeBSD is the routing engine, the awesome hardware is the forwarding engine). And now I need to digest this Linksys + Zebra mixture... ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026065128.GA14982>