Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 07:41:52 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@freebsd.org, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, tom@uniserve.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <199508010541.HAA05572@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <LX5Vy6m8c2@astral.msk.su> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka" at Jul 30, 95 09:56:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka wrote: > > >There is no binary /usr/libexec/uucp, that is a subdir (sick). uucico should > >not normally be called at command line, neither should uuxqt. > > Really? It is many cases when uucico and uuxqt called from command line. > I run uucp sites for several years and trust me, it is common case. > On my home computer I often start uucico > manually when I want to deliver mail as soon as possible and often There's normally a front-end called Uutry that hides the ugly handling of uucico from the user. Unfortunately, Taylor misses it (and mine is stolen from Data General. :) It starts uucico, and tail -f's the log file, so you can watch what's happening. > start uuxqt when don't want to wait until all files becomes received. ``run-uuxqt 2'' (or 3) is a better solution (IMHO). > (Does sendmail should no normally be called at command line too? Or what?) Sendmail is both. But even for its use as ``sendmail -bd'', it would clearly belong to /usr/sbin. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508010541.HAA05572>