Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:18:43 -0400
From:      mpd <mpd6334@cs.rit.edu>
To:        Shawn Kennedy <shawnlkennedy@lucent.com>
Cc:        Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>, alan.edmonds@t-motion.net, rehsack@liwing.de, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kernel install problem
Message-ID:  <20020416141843.A5571@rochester.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <NEBBLNBDCLDILGOPJLGIKENKCHAA.shawnlkennedy@lucent.com>; from shawnlkennedy@lucent.com on Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:02:45PM -0500
References:  <3CBC6134.4040804@owt.com> <NEBBLNBDCLDILGOPJLGIKENKCHAA.shawnlkennedy@lucent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:02:45PM -0500, Shawn Kennedy wrote:
<snipped>
> 
> So based upon Kent's info and Mike's info, should the cvsupfile
> look like this instead?
> 
> *default  host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org
> *default  base=/usr
> *default  prefix=/usr
> *default  release=cvs
> *default  tag=RELENG_4
> *default  delete use-rel-suffix
> 
> src-all
> *default tag=.
> ports-all
> doc-all

Looks good. Kent is right about the placement of the tag=. line.
I've always just used separate supfiles for ports and doc, 
because I update them at different times than I do the source
tree.

> 
> I do want to stay with -STABLE.  Is it possible to fix this
> with a new cvsup with a corrected cvsupfile as Mike stated to?

If your cvsup file is correct, you should be all set. I don't
see any problems with the one above. Even if you screw up
and delete the entire source tree, it won't hose the running
system, and you can fix the supfile and re-cvsup.

> 
> Also, as to why the kernel build is installing in /boot/kernel/,
> at the top of the kernel build, it lists a variable KMODDIR
> that is set to /boot/kernel/. I have no idea where this is getting
> set or by whom.

No idea. Something from -current, perhaps?

> 
> I have made no real modifications to /etc/make.conf (set the 
> XFREE86_VERSION to 4) and did not modify any Makefiles.
> 
> (BTW, I thought top-posting would be the norm as you would want to
> see the follow-up without having to wade through the whole post.
> On a list server, I can see why this would be a disadvantage. Sorry.)

Top-posting loses context, though. It's not a huge deal in a lot of 
cases, but is a real PITA when you want to respond point-by-point,
like this.

> 
> Shawn
> 

mike
-- 
___________________________________________________________
 
"YOU CAN NOT BUY AN EIGHT FOOT TALL CRIME FIGHTING
	ROBOT UNLESS YOU ARE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER!!!"
	- Pokey the Penguin from "REQUEST DENIED THEN GRANTED"

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020416141843.A5571>