Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 10:58:48 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: bazilio@economic.acnit.ac.ru (Vasily V. Grechishnikov) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Broken NetWare 3.12 TCP/IP support ? Message-ID: <199705061758.KAA18875@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970506162909.766A-100000@economic.acnit.ac.ru> from "Vasily V. Grechishnikov" at May 6, 97 04:51:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> world ( Near router 147.45.142.17) > ^ > | class C net 193.233.113.0 > FreeBSD box( 2.2-BETA) > |<-ed0 .1 | <-ed1 .17 > LAN0 LAN1 > | > |------NetWare 3.12 > | ^ . 19 | <- .50 > | LAN2 > | > | > .18 ed0->|------FreeBSD box( 2.2R) > | |<-de0 .33 |<- ed1 currently broken > - LAN3 LAN4 > > We have a some problems with LAN2 . Any action from that LAN (ping,ftp, > i.e) will failed at stage of forwarding packets from LAN1 cable to any > other, but only if on FreeBSD boxes not running routed -s . NetWare 3.12 > configred as a router. [ ... ] > Any suggestions ? Old NetWare will not support split netmasks correctly. If you have two cards on the netware server, the must have identical netmasks. In addition, for 3.11 or 3.12, I believe that the netmasks must be on 8 bit boundries, or they won't work (like old Linux networking, it doesn't support splitting a netmask on bit boundries). You don't give the 'names' of your wires, other than the top level one (named 193.233.113.0/255.255.255.0), so this is mostly speculation from my own experience using NetWare boxes as IP routers at Novell, Sandy. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705061758.KAA18875>