Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:47:44 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, S ren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps keyword.c src/lib/libc/i386/sys sigsuspend.S src/sys/i386/linux linux.h linux_dummy.c linux_misc. Message-ID: <199812200047.QAA03793@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:19:40 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.981219161736.7318G-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Note that I realise that you had the conditional attached as a prerequistite to not being killed for committing this, but still...) > I was asked to make it conditional because it doubles the size of the > Proc struct. Making it conditional makes it exponentially easier to screw up the world. Since we have to live with this extra information attached to the proc struct if we're going to thread at all, we might as well live with the change now. > I wish I hadn't because I screwed up a file when I reapplied the > conditionals after accidentally munging it. > See "eats crow" message Shit happens. The amount of heat that people get for breaking -current for a _few_minutes_ these days is a joke. It's becoming quite impossible to present any work-in-progress without half a dozen old grandmothers screaming about how it should be optional and buried under conditionals and damn you for an ungrateful child for leaving the door open and letting the cold breeze in... -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812200047.QAA03793>