Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 22:19:37 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Licia <licia@o-o.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Branding project names Message-ID: <XFMail.981105221937.asmodai@wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981105135703.16030B-100000@o-o>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Nov-98 Licia wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Wes Peters wrote: >> 1) Designed for FreeBSD >> Pure FreeBSD >> 100% FreeBSD >> > > I am personally not comfortable with any of these three. (speaking as a > programmer who is interested in 'certifying' some of her software as it's > released). These current names seem to imply things that may not be true, > and would cause me to think twice before applying the label if my software > were designed for native release on multiple os's. Something like FreeBSD > Native, Native FreeBSD, or FreeBSD Compatible would pose fewer quandries in > the decision to certify. Does the term Open Source seem valid with a term such as the above motto's? --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)wxs.nl Junior Network/Security Specialist FreeBSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.981105221937.asmodai>