Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:32:29 -0800 From: Jim Mock <jim@luna.cdrom.com> To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE tree? Message-ID: <20000331153228.A23599@luna.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003311824170.35313-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:25:11PM -0500 References: <20000331152145.A2827@luna.cdrom.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003311824170.35313-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 at 18:25:11 -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Jim Mock wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 at 15:17:13 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > > % locate kde > > > > > > but didn't see the kde11 in my ports tree. If these branches are > > > there, I certainly missed it!! > > > > Hmm, yeah, perhaps it should be just 'kde' since we only have one > > version in the tree.. (kde11-i18n would become kde-i18n). Anyone else > > have comments on this? > > > > Might be nice to differentiate when kde 2.0 is released. Will we really need to keep kde1x around for very long after 2.0 is released? We could always call it 'kde2' if it's brought in separately from kde, although I'm not sure I see a reason to have both in the tree after 2.0 is final and stable enough to be a port. If it's not stable, we can always do the 'kde' and 'kde-devel' thing.. *shrug* Doesn't really matter to me, was just a thought :-) - jim -- - jim mock - walnut creek cdrom/freebsd test labs - jim@luna.cdrom.com - - phone: 1.925.691.2800 x.3814 - fax: 1.925.674.0821 - jim@FreeBSD.org - - editor - The FreeBSDzine - www.freebsdzine.org - jim@freebsdzine.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000331153228.A23599>