Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:34:03 -0500
From:      Tim McMillen <timcm@umich.edu>
To:        Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>, "R.Munden" <orbitmaster@netorbit.com>
Cc:        Matthew King <kingy@ihug.com.au>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: A new FreeBSD commmand
Message-ID:  <01010616340304.07534@tim.elnsng1.mi.home.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101061042470.67612-100000@oddjob.adhesivemedia.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101061042470.67612-100000@oddjob.adhesivemedia.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Come on, the guy had to be joking.  How can somebody know how to write 
a correct shell script, with a descriptive header and not know how to 
read the shell manpage to find out about aliases.
	He was just having fun, though the attitude of remembering being a 
newbie sitting at a shell prompt and wondering what to do is a good one.

						Tim

On Saturday January 06, 2001 13:47, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> WHAT IS WRONG WITH ALL YOU PEOPLE!?!?!?!
>
> I suppose none of you remember when you first started with unix and
> wrote your first shell script and how good you felt that you were
> actually *doing* something on unix other than typing "mail"???
>
> Is this the type of response that you would want in response to some
> program you'd written?
>
> Give the guy a break.  Everyone starts somewhere.
>
> At least this guy is contributing something... the rest of you are
> just being downright mean.
>
> -philip
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, R.Munden wrote:
> > oh yeah, I forgot to put <sarcasm></sarcasm> around that
> >
> > --rjm--
> >
> > "... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was
> > that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful
> > termination of their C programs."
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dima
> > > Dorfman Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:36 PM
> > > To: R.Munden
> > > Cc: Matthew King; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > > Subject: Re: A new FreeBSD commmand
> > >
> > > > I was wondering if you could add some command line switches in
> > >
> > > case I wanted
> > >
> > > > to see the whole directory and the directory files themselves.
> > >
> > > Something
> > >
> > > > like wdl -a;  I think it should imitate the output of ls -la
> > > > maybe.
> > >
> > > If it's implemented as an alias, this functionality is already
> > > present.  'll' -u works as expected (translates to "ls -l -u").
> > >
> > > 					Dima Dorfman
> > > 					dima@unixfreak.org
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01010616340304.07534>