Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:33:46 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network Stack Locking Message-ID: <20040524153346.GI90465@empiric.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405241101151.9871@zeus> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040520162957.90528H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405241101151.9871@zeus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > RW>- ATM -- Harti? :-) > > Sure. At least netnatm, netgraph/atm and the various drivers. At one > point I want to get rid of netatm, so I don't want to put effort into > netatm (just keep it working and compliling). I second this. HATM has had its time, NATM is the way to go; it's much more flexible. Regards, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524153346.GI90465>