Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:25:28 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Edwards <peadar@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread problem + possible solution Message-ID: <45864268.7070706@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156@sea.ntplx.net> References: <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612151510130.26062@sea.ntplx.net> <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, David Xu wrote: > >> On Saturday 16 December 2006 04:11, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Peter Edwards wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've a problem when a process uses: >>>> libpthread >>>> detached threads >>>> mixed bound/unbound threads >>>> suspended threads (a la pthread_resume_np()) >>>> >>>> whereby some newly created suspended threads don't get scheduled. >>>> I think I've tracked it down, so if someone could review the >>>> reasoning, I'd be grateful. >>> >>> >>> I'm away for a few days, so I'd appreciate you waiting until >>> early next week -- unless David Xu looks at it and gives it >>> the ok. >> >> I will review it. > > > I looked at the patch and it looks OK to me. Go ahead and > commit unless David had some comments to it that I haven't > seen. > patch looks OK, commit it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45864268.7070706>