Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jul 2016 15:10:47 -0400
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: lib/libc/Versions.def: new symbol version for 12.x
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2DymK8g3V357f7WbedD3qXbabcN3=d3vGNJWFcBQ6cNbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1607291445570.11109@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <CABh_MKnZkd3U0jV07idrpHqaniZvzUbhnSHz3BpAAKOi7d807Q@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1607291445570.11109@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 July 2016 at 14:53, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> New symbol versions can be rolled back to -stable or other prior
> baselines.

If that happens I think having an FBSD_12.0 symbol in stable/11
actually makes it more clear what's happening, than if a FBSD_1.5
symbol appears in stable/11.

> Also, if there are no changes in a major release branch,
> there's no need to bump the symbol version.

That's fine too, the version would just jump from FBSD_10.0 to
FBSD_12.0 for example.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DymK8g3V357f7WbedD3qXbabcN3=d3vGNJWFcBQ6cNbQ>