Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:36:13 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Keith Leonard <keithl@wakko.gil.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OK, Let's phrase it a different way... Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970211143519.602A-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970211143720.5283A-100000@wakko.gil.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Keith Leonard wrote: > Does 2.1.7, 2.2 or 3.0 address the floppy tape backup problem any better > than 2.1.5??? As in - can anything other than the ancient QIC 40/80 > format be used for backup using 'ft' or 'lft'?? The result is not defined. I would say "Your mileage may vary." To be honest, these tapes are cheap. Go SCSI and save yourself the pain. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.970211143519.602A-100000>