Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 02:02:46 -0600 (CST) From: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com> To: wcooley@nakedape.navi.net (W. Reilly Cooley) Cc: Benoit.Rossier@mcnet.ch, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW performance impact? Message-ID: <199903310802.CAA13921@home.dragondata.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9903302352470.27147-100000@rheingold> from "W. Reilly Cooley" at "Mar 30, 1999 11:55: 3 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > > > Right now, i've got close to 2MB out, and 1MB in, with two fxp0 cards, > > and a pretty heavy ruleset (40 rules, that most packets have to pass > > through all of them). > > > > last pid: 26211; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > 13 processes: 1 running, 12 sleeping > > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 6.6% interrupt, 93.4% idle > > > > > > This is on a P/200. > > How much traffic do you have going through at the time you posted this? > This data would be more meaningful if, say, you we're doing an FTP or dump > to a machine just on the other side, so you had lots of traffic. If it's > idle, then it doesn't really matter how many rules or how much you've > got--it'd be as idle on a 386-16. > Well, the states are about the same right now, and according to my router: 5 minute input rate 1411000 bits/sec, 632 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 609000 bits/sec, 624 packets/sec Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903310802.CAA13921>