Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 14:36:41 -0500 From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 23431 for review Message-ID: <200301081936.h08Jafob058017@green.bikeshed.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:45:19 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030108134442.17139D-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Not all synthetic pseudofs file systems might be multilabel; does the > pseudofs model easily allow individual pseudofs file systems to set the > mount flags? If so, that might be a preferred model. Well, my thought on this matter is that all pseudofs filesystems are free to not implement the new associate entry point (like the devfs one) when I implement it, and they'll be effectively singlelabel filesystems by getting the single from the mount structure. I may be confused as to whether or not this will work, because SEBSD does create "valid" vnode labels without a create operation. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org <> bfeldman@tislabs.com \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301081936.h08Jafob058017>