Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 22:10:45 -0600 (MDT)
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
Cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <199609250410.WAA10368@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960924203234.4358D-100000@maryann.eng.umd.edu>
References: <v02140b02ae6e1eda1dd5@[208.2.87.4]> <Pine.OSF.3.95.960924203234.4358D-100000@maryann.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> of the case is based on compatibility. I've disagreed with Richard in the > past when he was using the compatibility to move us towards SYSV without a > strong reason, but since we ARE bsd, and the -d option IS bsd, the The -d option *ISN'T* BSD. It was added by J.T. in NetBSD, and when OpenBSD took the entire NetBSD source tree over it was there as well. I'll bet BSDi doesn't have it, and neither does Ultrix, which are also BSD based systems. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609250410.WAA10368>