Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:36:56 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Jan Pechanec <pechy@hp735.cvut.cz> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>, Don <don@calis.blacksun.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Journaling Message-ID: <20347.941452616@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:11:06 %2B0100." <Pine.SGI.4.05.9911011109410.21204-100000@akat.civ.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.SGI.4.05.9911011109410.21204-100000@akat.civ.cvut.cz>, Jan Pechanec writes: > > Vahalia [UNIX Internals, Prentice-Hall] says that FFS is an >original BSD filesystem and UFS is rewritten FFS for vnode layer. > Well, who do you trust, Kirk & the source, or Vahalia ? Poul-Henning >On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>...Whereas in *BSD "UFS" refers to the unix sematics layer (directory >>manipulation and all that) and "FFS" refers to the underlying storage >>object manager (which only understands inodes and their layout.) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20347.941452616>