Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:34:13 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KSE milestone 3 ALMOST there. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201252330570.35365-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020126002307.24865A@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
probably not. I had to change a lot of things so that they used a new algorythm that degenerated to teh same as the old alorythm in a 1:1 case. That new code is still being run in the 1:1 case. Having said that, yes it runs but I think that signals are probably at least partially broken and debugging support is probably broken too. I haven't got the 2nd thread out to userland yet.. (today's task) On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > I just hought I'd share with everyone here the following > > extract from ddb's "ps" command. (sorry about any linewrap). > > > > db> ps > > pid proc addr uid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesg wchan cmd > > 566 ce7b8580 cf1d1000 0 313 566 000c002 Normal (threaded) ksetest > > . . . . . . . . thread 0xcdb589c0 . . . --not blocked-- > > . . . . . . . . thread 0xcdb59140 . . . --not blocked-- > > Nice! > > > Of course I got into ddb because of a page fault :-) > > so it's not quite there yet. but...... > > Is it stable enough for non KSE'd processes to be committed? > > -- > Dan Eischen > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201252330570.35365-100000>