Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:43:20 +0200 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@mailbox.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it okay to run ports from under poudriere ? Message-ID: <87tw13tvfr.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <VI1PR02MB12001446594018E70EB81AF5F6810@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> References: <VI1PR02MB12001446594018E70EB81AF5F6810@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:42:50 +0200, Manish Jain wrote: > Hi, > > I am a FreeBSD user of 15+ years. Of late, I have started contributed to > the community with ports that I have developed myself. > > As a port developer, I am running poudriere for testing my ports. Now it > seems a bit of a waste to me that I have 2 ports trees, each a few GB : > > /usr/ports/ > /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/ > > So is it okay if I run my ports from /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/ ? > > If needed I can even symlink /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default as > /usr/ports This is described in the porters handbook: <https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html>; 9.5.6. Using Manually Managed Ports Trees with Poudriere -- Herbert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87tw13tvfr.wl-herbert>