Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:39:18 +0900 From: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org Cc: tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp, arch@FreeBSD.org, bright@wintelcom.net, dillon@earth.backplane.com Subject: Re: Even 1GB KVA is not enough, but we have no more space Message-ID: <vm66ko8v1l.wl@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:08:40 -0800 (PST)" <XFMail.001212090840.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <vmd7ey8hdr.wl@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <XFMail.001212090840.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:08:40 -0800 (PST), John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> said: John> The reason being that when you do the wakeup(), another CPU might start John> executing other kernel task immediately. The first thing it will do is block Thanks, I added to the committed patch. tegge has point out that we ay still run into a deadlock if malloc(9) of an inode failes. So my next task is to improve vnode recycling (which depends on my learing how vnodes work) -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vm66ko8v1l.wl>