Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 22:14:07 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, david@catwhisker.org, gene@nttmcl.com, Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hang on flushing buffers w/today's -CURRENT, SMP system Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202082213110.5404-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.020208231752.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No, I just never went into that particular clause of code But is has made me rethink the whole issue. On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 09-Feb-02 Julian Elischer wrote: > > yes,, this exactly fits the symptoms! > > > > I've committed it. > > (it's definitly wrong) > > assume this will solv ethe problem. > > now why doesn't MINE fail? > > Probably cause you are running your other tree that makes mi_switch() auto do > the setrunqueue? :) > > -- > > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0202082213110.5404-100000>