Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:18:09 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marius_N=FCnnerich?= <marius@nuenneri.ch> Cc: Cyrus Rahman <crahman@gmail.com>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Experiences with Gpart Message-ID: <7353F23F-F944-47C9-A97D-6DE247F958AE@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <b649e5e0810191024s794445fdke8f2aac31a5617c@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e77bdb50810011331y7216eac3yf85907f96f5e8370@mail.gmail.com> <b649e5e0810191024s794445fdke8f2aac31a5617c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 19, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Marius N=FCnnerich wrote: >> Despite the intent of gpt's being to make such nesting unnecessary, =20= >> as >> a means of defining the structure of gmirrors, which take up the >> entire extent of whatever encloses them, the nesting was very =20 >> helpful. > > Maybe nesting simply works if you comment the first if in =20 > g_part_gpt_probe() in > sys/geom/part/g_part_gpt.c ? I don't get why this is restricted, =20 > should be my > decision to nest or not imo. Nesting is not allowed as per the GPT specification. --=20 Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7353F23F-F944-47C9-A97D-6DE247F958AE>