Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:02:57 +0200 From: "Kristof Provost" <kp@FreeBSD.org> To: "Christian Mauderer" <christian.mauderer@embedded-brains.de> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Changes to pfctl to allow easier integration into a library Message-ID: <0C7EC45D-C3BC-4417-AF77-3ACC027D28B5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <cb7c6bb6-8160-3524-5432-d4ff46e16af5@embedded-brains.de> References: <25df9fd5-be75-b9ae-aa3a-22abef3bddf0@embedded-brains.de> <cb7c6bb6-8160-3524-5432-d4ff46e16af5@embedded-brains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 Aug 2016, at 15:03, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Can I improve anything to make the patches more acceptable? > Can you explain why 0003-pfctl-Pull-static-variables-out-of-the-function.patch is required? I’m not sure I see why you need it. > Is the virtualisation that Bjoern mentioned necessary or was my > interpretation correct that this is only meant for kernel space code? I believe your interpretations is correct. User land code should not have to care about VIMAGE. Regards, Kristof
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0C7EC45D-C3BC-4417-AF77-3ACC027D28B5>