Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 09:16:12 -0500 From: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: S6-init was: OpenRC 0.35 for FreeBSD Message-ID: <0120B9B9-74CA-47CF-8890-574AB3DC8115@longcount.org> In-Reply-To: <e74f8ce3-fab5-bac6-65b0-c77799cf5ac3@rlwinm.de> References: <CAFvkmYNBtH-MizOLVnSR0c5VuYRpYEDpyWig2x%2By7PM6rQkL=A@mail.gmail.com> <20180302083756.GH34685@e.0x20.net> <BE852FF1-A856-4913-93CA-3F7F67DEB855@FreeBSD.org> <35AC3784-D02B-4EB1-9F82-E522B7A7730E@FreeBSD.org> <e74f8ce3-fab5-bac6-65b0-c77799cf5ac3@rlwinm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:34 AM, Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> wrote: >=20 >> On 02.03.18 17:11, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >>> On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:13, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >>>=20 >>> [...] there are a number of options that I've heard of vying for conside= ration: >>>=20 >>> - finit >>> - jobd (is this still a thing?) >>> - nosh >>> - OpenRC >>> - runit >> Oh, and also s6: https://skarnet.org/software/s6/why.html >=20 > I've run s6 + s6-rc as init replacement for FreeBSD 11.1 on my laptop for o= ver a year. The init_path kenv simplifies testing alternative init systems a= lot. It works really well and required only minimal porting. Jan I am interested to know more ; do you have any notes ? Also did you ever t= ry runit? Again it=E2=80=99s another similar project but if I remember it=E2= =80=99s in ports . =E2=80=94 Mark Saad | nonesuch@longcount.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0120B9B9-74CA-47CF-8890-574AB3DC8115>