Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:34:54 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk ports/biology/pymol Makefile pkg-plist ports/cad/pythoncad Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/gadfly Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/skytools Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/zodb3 ... Message-ID: <20090609143454.GA17830@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <e890cae60906090012x591e0fe1h6ea14a47f4d700c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <200906082230.n58MUtkU040528@repoman.freebsd.org> <e890cae60906090012x591e0fe1h6ea14a47f4d700c4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/9 Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org>: > > miwi 2009-06-08 22:30:55 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > . UPDATING > [...] > > Log: > > - Update lang/python26 and make Python 2.6.2 to the default Python version > > > > Tested by: 3 pointyhat runs > > Thanks to: pav, gahr, lwhsu, mva, amdmi3 > > > I successfully upgraded python25 to python26 using portmaster -o, but > got stuck at the upgrade-site-packages step. > When executing > # cd /usr/ports/lang/python > # make PORTUPGRADE_CMD=/usr/local/sbin/portmaster upgrade-site-packages > > it complains that it can't find pkg_which, which seems to be part of > portupgrade. > Is pkg_which the same as pkg_info -wq or pkg_info -oq ? You can use pkg_info -qW but there are other subtleties involved. For example, the usage of pkg_which can take multiple arguments on the command line but pkg_info can not. This means you have to use "-L 1" with xargs which drastically slows things down. I'm working on a patch which I hope to send out for review soon. > Is there a real difference between make upgrade-site-packages and just > updating all installed *py25* packages manually? Yes, as it's not just py25 packages that need to be updated. For example there are files in /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages which pkg_info tells me came from a package that does not start with py25 (in this case it is pyblosxom). For now I have spoken with Martin and removed the portmaster instructions from UPDATING because of the issues you outline in this thread. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090609143454.GA17830>