Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:54:37 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <200705261554.38444.shoesoft@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <f39btv$k3t$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20070525095146.GA45288@freebsd.org> <20070526125438.GA93705@freebsd.org> <f39btv$k3t$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 26 May 2007 15:15:34 Ivan Voras wrote: > Roman Divacky wrote: > > well.. I dont think that 60% increase of size when you are optimizing for > > size is normal. I even think its a "bug" in that sense that something > > wrong is set somewhere which causes this. > > > > I certainly dont believe this is normal > > I'm using the default make flags. In my case, it's release, > non-debugging 6-RELEASE kernel of 26 MB vs debugging kernel of 7-CURRENT > of 106 MB :) I guess that's due to /boot/kernel/*.symbols which are not present in my 6.2 installation. gcc42 file size increase shouldn't be that much.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705261554.38444.shoesoft>