Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:10:22 -0700 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/rescue/rescue Makefile Message-ID: <20030714191044.GA15083@lizzy.catnook.com> In-Reply-To: <p05210660bb38acc2a751@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200307111657.h6BGvhaX047506@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030714003736.A38298@hub.freebsd.org> <20030715035725.R8481@gamplex.bde.org> <p05210660bb38acc2a751@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Historic counterexamples notwithstanding, NO is a modifier in this context and
as such should be made lexically explicit. My vote goes to NO_.
$0.02,
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030714191044.GA15083>