Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 May 2010 14:55:48 -0400
From:      Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
To:        batcilla itself <batcilla@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, lists@walkertc.com
Subject:   Re: Avila Network Platform: GW2348-4, GW2348-2, GW2347
Message-ID:  <53D78536-B33F-42D3-A58E-364CEC996366@errno.com>
In-Reply-To: <x2q6c36ec371004270525of0cca4f6q48615d6e92ad232@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <000a01cae603$37c777b0$a7566710$@com> <x2q6c36ec371004270525of0cca4f6q48615d6e92ad232@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:25 AM, batcilla itself wrote:

> Support of Avila GW2348-4 uses CF for a kernel and rootfs,
> GW2347 does not have CF. Regarding of GW2348-2 - if it can have CF
> option enabled - it may work out of box or almost with nanobsd.
> May be will require minor tuning of GPIO setup to mPCI and PHY
> connecting to NPE.
> I think for now, when board is EOL, - is no sense to add support for
> Avila eeprom auto-configuration mode.
> But generally if you pack anything into kernel it may even work with
> GW2347 (there is 8 flash, 32MB RAM only).
>
> //batcilla
>
>
> 2010/4/27  <lists@walkertc.com>:
>> The Avila GW2348-4 is supported according to the FreeBSD/ARM  
>> Project Page.
>>
>> Does anyone know if FreeBSD would work on similar Avila products  
>> such as the
>> GW2348-2 or the GW2347?  Has anyone tried this?

I believe the flash support works but never actually stuck a rootfs in  
the flash and tested.  Not sure how work is needed to automate this  
config w/ nanobsd.

	Sam




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D78536-B33F-42D3-A58E-364CEC996366>