Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:31:02 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>, Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Like to commit my diskprep 
Message-ID:  <4559.973247462@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "03 Nov 2000 11:28:41 %2B0100." <xzphf5pl57q.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzphf5pl57q.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> writes:
>>     Yes.  Increasing the number of bytes per inode will reduce the number
>>     of inodes and thus reduce fsck time.  Increasing the number of cylinders
>>     in a group will localize inodes into bigger chunks, reducing seeking
>>     and also thus reduce fsck time.
>
>That was what I hoped - thanks!

...and setting your fragment size to 4k has a surprisingly small positive
effect on your performance.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4559.973247462>