Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:54:47 -0500
From:      "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net>
To:        "Ian R. Justman" <ianj@calweb.com>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Qpopper and hashed directories
Message-ID:  <003501bf7989$3a8a8420$0300000a@doot.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002171245240.86881-100000@staff.calweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When I used qopper I found it to be extremely slow and unreliable. Has it
improved much?

And wouldn't the hashing be done by your MTA, since it's responsible for the
actual delivery of the mail into a certain directory. OF course you would
have to have your POP3 server look there, but that's about it, right?

I guess I don't know what's involved, though I'm interested. Please
elaborate.


----- Original Message -----
From: Ian R. Justman <ianj@calweb.com>
To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 3:47 PM
Subject: Qpopper and hashed directories


>
> Hello, all.
>
> Just curious, has anyone implemented directory hashing with mailspools
> under qpopper, e.g. /var/mail/j/joeuser?  This would be helpful in a
> situation where you have thousands of mailspools.
>
> Besides, it would be nice to not have to re-invent the wheel.  :)
>
> --Ian.
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003501bf7989$3a8a8420$0300000a>