Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:15:47 +0100 From: "Joe Holden" <mail@m.jwh.me.uk> To: "'Walter Schwarzenfeld'" <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: <naddy@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Message-ID: <010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$@m.jwh.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Walter Schwarzenfeld
> Sent: 10 March 2016 18:17
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?!
>
> Makefile
> OPTIONS_DEFAULT= RESSL
>
> RESSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libtls.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libressl
>
>
> turn option RESSL to off.
> _______________________________________________
That is not a fix since it breaks at least nginx in the official repo,
because nginx depends on openssl and openntpd depends on libre.
Either the entire tree should move to a library supported by everything, or
the openntpd port gets split into meta packages so that we don't need to
return to a stage where everyone is building ports.
Was this not even considered or tested?
(Cc naddy)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$>