Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:29:43 +0100 From: Pedro Timoteo <deh@meganet.pt> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top uptime! Message-ID: <0104201829431V.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> In-Reply-To: <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104201901010.24366-100000@servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de> <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 20 April 2001 18:25, you wrote: > I'm not saying that Linux is more stable (I know it isn't, I use both), but > in this case I don't think the stability of Linux is fairly shown here. Also (it's funny to reply to my own message), for a FreeBSD to have an uptime greater than 1000 days, it's got to be an early 2.x. So, this list shows nothing about the stability of 3.x or 4.x. I'm not *doubting* it's great, but we'll only have "proof" when in 3 or 4 years there are some 4.xs still running. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0104201829431V.20864>