Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:28:26 +0100
From:      "Carlos Amengual" <amengual@healthnet.es>
To:        "Greg Lehey" <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        "Soren Schmidt" <sos@freebsd.dk>, <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: kern/22086: DMA errors during intensive disk activity on vinum  volume
Message-ID:  <010d01c05a10$a6901190$0400000a@hin>
References:  <200011290755.IAA75175@freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No lack of consideration for Greg's work intended, but as RAID is essentially
meant to be used in critical-mission servers, people isn't likely to be
willing to play & debug something on which their businesses will depend,
especially when hardware controllers (which apparently work) are available.

Carlos

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Soren Schmidt" <sos@freebsd.dk>
Para: "Greg Lehey" <grog@lemis.com>
CC: "Carlos Amengual" <webmaster@healthnet-sl.es>; <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Enviado: miércoles 29 de noviembre de 2000 8:55
Asunto: Re: kern/22086: DMA errors during intensive disk activity on vinum
volume


> It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
> > >
> > > This is an old problem with vinum, somehow vinum manage to trash
> > > the ad_request struct between where the ata drives makes it in
> > > ad_strategy and when it actually gets used later..
> > > I thought this was fixed at least in -current long ago, but
> > > apparently this was either not backported to -stable or the fix
> > > was not good enough.
> >
> > No, the problem went into hiding.  It was you who thought it had gone
> > away.
>
> Yes, at a time, but back then we found out that fxp just accelerated
> the problem, it did not create it.
>
> > 1.  This config does not include an fxp device, which you had in the
> >     past blamed for the problems:
> >
> >     > Now, I'm not sure if its vinum or the fxp driver that has a
> >     > problem, but since others have seen strange problems semilar to
> >     > this on other type of systems, I'd say it points very much at
> >     > fxp...  The latest fix you put into -current is needed though...
>
> See above, I provided you with dumps and what not, but it newer
> got past that. Since you removed your maintainer bit on vinum it
> all went into a halt.  In the meantime I have decommisioned all
> the vinum boxes I had out there, fortunately all had either
> promise or highpoint controllers so they now run ATA RAID's
> happily without any problems, so vinum is no longer an issue for
> me at least...
>
> > 2.  Robin seems to be able to work through the source code, so this
> >     time we may be able to catch it.
>
> More power to you :)
>
> -Søren
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010d01c05a10$a6901190$0400000a>