Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:32:03 +0200 From: "Daniel Blankensteiner" <db@traceroute.dk> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD daemon configurations redesign Message-ID: <011201c20832$34404750$6800a8c0@rafter> References: <F67gL6wxvw0IDT8zAJ90000d078@hotmail.com> <00c601c2082d$bc531ff0$6800a8c0@rafter> <3CF6B300.145E0CD9@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> > Daniel Blankensteiner wrote: > > I don't know anything about the SysV-style, but yes the core/base > > daemons and the user/port daemons should be kept apart! > > If they weren't, then all daemons might as well be ports, > have package registrations, and be easily replaceable and/or > removable for small footprint installations. > > And without our bimonthly "why is sendmail there by default?" > flame-fest, where would we be? Well maybe create a daemons system. Something like ports but only with daemons, then all daemons work the same way (regarding where they place the files and what they are called and "what" is in them). Then no daemons it there by default, but when they are installed they all act and look like base daemons? Or something like that......maybe the daemon "ports" should not have 3 ftp server to choose from, but then services like sendmail it not there by default. Terry, what do you think about the /etc/daemons/ suggestion? and the other things about logging, user access file and so on? br db To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?011201c20832$34404750$6800a8c0>