Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:00:03 -0400 From: Jordan Caraballo <jordancaraballo87@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=c3=a9?= <olivier@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell, PE R530 Message-ID: <0cdc69d4-e23f-4beb-c4af-59259529287f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bq%2BTco=ApJ28iQSgMkzieMJUMLxc31x2yJe=GEe3b-ZVk2qYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <8f637e2e-cd59-dc65-8476-30989bea516b@gmail.com> <20170103174627.GW37118@zxy.spb.ru> <ebb04a3e-bcde-6d50-af63-348e8d06fcba@gmail.com> <CA%2Bq%2BTco=ApJ28iQSgMkzieMJUMLxc31x2yJe=GEe3b-ZVk2qYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Oliver, my bad, I missed that one. Here is the info: * Switch with 48x 10G ports and 12x 40G ports was used * (48) 10G connected nodes were used. * (24) nodes on each side of the firewall * Packet per second (PPS) tests were run using 'iperf' * Bandwidth tests were run using 'nuttcp' * Parallelization was handled by using pdsh * Each of the 24 sending nodes ran either: iperf3 -c "<target>" -u -A 5 -l 512 -b 0 -t "<duration>" -J nuttcp -fparse -l 128k -w1m -T "<duration>" "<target>" On 31/01/17 16:45, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Jordan Caraballo > <jordancaraballo87@gmail.com <mailto:jordancaraballo87@gmail.com>> wrote: > > This are the most recent stats. No advances so far. The system has > -Current right now. > > Any help or feedback would be appreciated. > > > I've tried: But you didn't answer my previous question. > > How do you generate your IP traffic ? > What tool are you using and can you provide the exact command line used ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0cdc69d4-e23f-4beb-c4af-59259529287f>