Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:09:53 -0400 From: "Coffin, Dexter" <idnopheq@comcast.net> To: alpha <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.0RC3 Still Fails to Compile on Alpha Message-ID: <1022620203.374.122.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> In-Reply-To: <15603.57059.709247.957736@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <1022613457.374.12.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> <15603.57059.709247.957736@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, All and Andrew! In so far as funky linking goes, according to Mozilla group the answer is no. But they said the same thing about their use of zip ... yet this is the only thing I can find to break (native) zip ... <sigh> I'd like to upgrade to -current, but when my W2K-infested laptop decides not to boot (like right now!) I need the relative stability -stable/-PR offers ... I'm going to rebuild that laptop tomorrow. Maybe after that I can go to -current and try ... I think I just need another Alpha to test -current with!!! (<- gross over-rationalization to buy new hardware) THX Dex BTW, if anyone DID get it (Mozilla 1.0-RCx) to compile and install, can they offer it up for a package install? Of course, the build platform would likely have to be less than or equal to 4.6-RC ... I only need it for the ~1% of sites I cannot render with OSF/1 Netscape 4.78 or Konquerer 3 (not counting java-dependent pages, which is another issue all together). :^D On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 15:47, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > How is libxpcom being built? Are they doing any fancy linker tricks? > If so, try turning them off. > > If that's not an option, then look into using hte ld-elf.so from > -current. The alpha rtld in -current was recently updated to make > less assumptions about the ordering of sections & generally be more > bullet-proof. > > (be careful installing it, and save the old version somewhere where > you can replace it using only statically linked binaries). > > Drew > > Coffin, Dexter writes: > > Hi, All! > > > > Well, anyone yet have any clue as to ... > > > > <snip> > > > > /usr/bin/sed -e "s;@PREFIX@;/usr/X11R6;g" > > /usr/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh > > >/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/mozilla > > (cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/bin; /usr/bin/env > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=. ./regxpcom; echo > > skin,install,select,classic/1.0 >> chrome/installed-chrome.txt; echo > > locale,install,select,en-US >> chrome/installed-chrome.txt; > > /usr/bin/env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=. ./regchrome) > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./libxpcom.so: Unsupported relocation type 240 > > in non-PLT relocations > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1022620203.374.122.camel>