Date: 16 Jul 2002 21:18:49 +0200 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> Cc: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/apr-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-plist ports/devel/apr-devel/files patch-apr-Makefile.in Message-ID: <1026847130.50932.30.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <20020716190600.GC2767@electricjellyfish.net> References: <200207151811.g6FIBRvv083829@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207161121370.71380-100000@pebkac.owp.csus.edu> <20020716190600.GC2767@electricjellyfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Does this change, or deal with PR ports/39091 (mv *-config to > > libdir to coexist with apr-devel)? > > i was unaware of that pr, but unfortunately no, it does not solve the > problem. you still can't have apr and apache2 installed on the same > box (ironic, isn't it!). a new version of apache2 is being rolled > soon, so when it hits the ports tree i'll look at making it possible > to have apache2 use the ports tree version of apr, but until then it's > not possible. > as for moving apr-config and apu-config to lib/apache2 for the apache2 > port, that's something that should be taken up with the maintainer. i This also concerns the apr port. *-config and the libs of the apr-port should then moved to lib/apr. > don't see anything wrong with the idea though. on the other hand, > perhaps we should think about just hacking the apache2 port to just > not install it's version of apr-config and apu-config? IMO that would be best idea. Maybe make it linking statically against it's own apr version, if it can't use port one. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026847130.50932.30.camel>