Date: 04 Oct 2002 11:19:16 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inet_aton() Bug or feature? Message-ID: <1033696158.61118.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20021004013814.GA70364@ussenterprise.ufp.org> References: <1136947159.20021003160026@yahoo.com> <20021003195515.GA92263@blossom.cjclark.org> <20021004013814.GA70364@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:08, Leo Bicknell wrote: > 0xffffff00 was hex, > 0123456701234567 was octal, > 010.010.010.010 was 4 decimal parts > > I was very surprised from the poster that 192.168.0.010 might actually > be 192.168.0.8. I would imagine this behaviour is like it is because that is how atoi and friends work.. All of this stuff was written by C programmers and it shows 8-) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033696158.61118.13.camel>