Date: 05 Oct 2002 17:36:28 -0500 From: "Adriel Cardenas G." <aztlanet@gmx.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evolution 1.1.1 (ok!) Message-ID: <1033857388.7217.5.camel@unxstar> In-Reply-To: <20021004224416.Y41592-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20021004224416.Y41592-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > >> I have seen this problem too on both my 4.7-rc and -current box
> > > > >> It apears that ldconfig does not remember the diffrent paths after a
> > > > >> reboot
> > > > >>
> > > > >> locate libeutil.so.0
> > > > >> /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/libeutil.so.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >> when I run as root "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > > >> evolution starts
> > > > >>
> > > > >> hope this helps,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >I haven't been able to reproduce this. I rebooted my 4.7-RC box and
> > > > >verified that /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1 was not in the ldconfig
> > > > path,
> > > > >then started Evo. It came right up. Tell me, did you build with pilot
> > > > >support?
> > > >
> > > > Guess what?...same thing happened here, just ran as root...
> > > >
> > > > "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > >
> > > > and that was it! Evo starts.
> > > >
> > > > Do you think we should report this as part of the Evolution beta-test?
> > > > or what this could it be?
> > >
> > > I think this should be reported to Ximian. libeutil should be a module
> > > that is dynamically loaded at run time. If it was meant to be a normal
> > > shared library, they should install it in ${X11BASE}/lib.
> > >
> > > That said, I still can't reproduce this on my -stable machine.
> > >
> >
> > When I installed it, I didn't use the WITHOUT_PILOT argument, therefore
> > it has the pilot support, probably it has something to do with that.
>
> That's most likely it. The problem is most likely due to linking issues
> with the pilot libs.
>
> >
> > I'll report it to ximian.
>
> I've already reported the building problems to Ximian. Hopefully this
> will go away with the next beta. Please add a bug report, though. When
> you do, include all the errors, the fact that you're building with pilot
> support, and that all the modules in the evolution directory should be
> dynamically loaded without needing to be in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Thanks.
>
> As a workaround, I'll probably have to add an RC script to install that
> directory in the ld cache.
>
Hi I recently made an portupgrade -ra, and it upgrade this Gnome related
packages:
gdk-pixbuf
gnomecanvas
gnomecontrolcenter2
libgtop
libogg
libvorbis
metacity
pkgconfig
sodipodi
plus this ones
Abiword
apache2
fetchmail
webmin
xchat2
and after the portupgrade I did not have to make the explicit load of
/usr/X11/lib/evolution/1.1
Funny thing, huh?
Adriel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033857388.7217.5.camel>