Date: 19 Apr 2003 20:49:30 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> Cc: petef@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: use_gnomeng Message-ID: <1050799770.13770.51.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20030420002953.55575.qmail@web13503.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030420002953.55575.qmail@web13503.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-YLTmJPIBMFXZiGqfUVkf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 20:29, David Yeske wrote: > Should gnomeng be removed from existing ports? Yes. I have a script that I'm using to do this. > Should gnomeng not be used for new ports?=20 No. > Does > this depend on the gnome components used? We have updated documentation on the way. However, the porting guide at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html is still valid except you no longer need the USE_GNOMENG macro. > How about a port that just uses gtk12?=20 USE_GNOME=3D gtk12 > If the gnomeng > removal plan has been posted somewhere I have not read it and would appre= ciate the url... We're planning an official announcement as soon as the new docs are done....hopefully this weekend. Joe >=20 > Regards, > David Yeske >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-YLTmJPIBMFXZiGqfUVkf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+oe6ab2iPiv4Uz4cRAl47AJwLWbEyB76MedjTY1efJ9SyFqyA1ACcDkJM 96I+gx5uvpjlxmkVUX8C7lY= =BwIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YLTmJPIBMFXZiGqfUVkf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050799770.13770.51.camel>