Date: 21 Apr 2003 17:39:44 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD Gnome Mailing List <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: battstat-applet-2.0.4 vs Gnome-2 Message-ID: <1050943183.695.251.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1050941159.393.4.camel@gyros> References: <20030421134316.T29757@omni.vickiandstacey.com> <20030421145715.GA84702@sushi.andersa.net> <1050940353.695.247.camel@localhost> <1050941159.393.4.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 17:05, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 11:52, Stacey Roberts wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 15:57, Anders Andersson wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 01:45:56PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Can someone tell me if there are any issues with installing > > > > battstat-applet-2.0.4 with Gnome-2, please? > > > > > > IIRC the battstat in gnomeapplets2 is battstat_applet these days. They > > > replaced the old one with this and reworked it for gnome2. > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > The reason for my not being sure about this, is the fact that in the > > Makefile there reads: > > > > USE_GNOME= gnomehack gnomeprefix libpanel > > > > As against what I recall reading in FreeBSD-Gnome advisories about that > > line reading "USE_GNOMENG", or something like that - as an indication as > > to the port's Gnome-2 status.., > > > > Has this flag-setting changed, then? > > This port will not work in GNOME 2. Anders is correct, in that the new > battery applet in gnomeapplets2 should be comparable. Is this: Applications > System Tools > System Monitor that you're referring to? Regards, Stacey > > Joe > > > > > Regards, > > > > Stacey > > > > > > > > Please spank me if I'm wrong. -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050943183.695.251.camel>