Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:13:31 -0700 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: conrads@cox.net Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion Message-ID: <1090628010.2748.78.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040723190712.conrads@cox.net> References: <XFMail.20040723190712.conrads@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On 23-Jul-2004 Eric Anholt wrote: > > OK, the final version of the X.Org conversion patch has hit the tree. > > No ports appear to be broken by the upgrade at this time. X.Org has > > been made the default X distribution on -current. Other versions of > > FreeBSD retain the same default X distribution (XFree86) but can > > upgrade by setting X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg in /etc/make.conf. > > Hooray! Thank you! > > Just one question: have the inconsistencies been worked out in > translating XFree86 fonts package dependencies to Xorg fonts packages? > Have all ports that depend on XFree86 fonts packages been adjusted, and > if so, how was this issue resolved? > > The problem I've seen is that there's some overlap between font package > contents going from XFree86 to Xorg, mainly re: TrueType and Type1 > fonts. > > Don't mean to sound like Mr. Rain-On-Your-Parade or anything here. :-) > If these problems still need some work, I certainly understand. Just > wondering what the current status is. Yes, it was dealt with by making those ports point at the font package that provides truetype fonts. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1090628010.2748.78.camel>