Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:34:38 -0700 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ryan Newman <ryannewman47@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: mergemaster just screwed me Message-ID: <1097192078.1794.6.camel@server> In-Reply-To: <20041007161322.S826@bo.vpnaa.bet> References: <BAY15-F22SVMum03yMJ0000281c@hotmail.com> <20041007015527.M6673@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <1097133252.92555.1.camel@server> <20041007161322.S826@bo.vpnaa.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-ANEL331J2eKLLfYzwRJC
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 16:22, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 22:59, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> >> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Ryan Newman wrote:
> >>
> >>>> From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
> >>>> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> >>>> Subject: mergemaster just screwed me
> >>>> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:48:58 -0700
> >>>>
> >>>> I just ran mergemaster and it deleted my named.conf and everything
> >>>> else. I'm guessing it did an rm /etc/namedb/* or something like tha=
t.
>=20
>=20
> Mergemaster doesn't do anything of the sort. It never takes action on=20
> any file or directory on the system unless the user tells it to.
Doesn't do it on purpose ;)
> >>>> My system was setup correctly with /etc/namedb linked to
> >>>> /var/named/etc/namedb and it was all placed properly. :(
>=20
> When you say "it was all placed properly," what do you mean by that?
Everything according to UPDATING. I've had bind9 working for a good
deal of time. Close to immediately after it was put in current.
> >> I don't mean to be an ass, but you *need to read UPDATING* when you
> >> upgrade CURRENT. The 20040928 entry detailed the steps required for a
> >> smooth transition from bind8 to bind9.
> >
> > I don't take your comment as anything but informative. In my case,
> > however, I *DID* read UPDATING and I followed it completely. My system
> > was completely working with bind9 and then I did a mergemaster and it
> > wiped out all my settings!!!!
>=20
> The good news is that if you actually followed the instructions in=20
> UPDATING you should have a copy of your old settings in /etc/namedb.bak.=20
> And of course, the mergemaster man page counsels you to make good=20
> backups before running it.
Yes, I was fortunate to have things backed up.
> In order to debug this we'll need more information:
>=20
> 1. How do you usually invoke mergemaster?
> 2. Do you have a .mergemasterrc file?
> 3. Do you run a MM_PRE_COMPARE_SCRIPT?
> 4. Do you have any *_BIND_* options in /etc/make.conf?
> 5. Output of 'ls -la /etc/namedb /var/named/etc/namedb'
1. I invoke by simply typing mergemaster.
2. yes, the contents are:
MM_PRE_COMPARE_SCRIPT=3D/usr/local/bin/mergemaster_precompare
3. The contents of /usr/local/bin/mergemaster_precompare are...
#!/bin/sh
# NOTE: No PATH needed, because mm's PATH is already draconian enough
case "${PRE_WORLD}" in
'')
rm -f ${TEMPROOT}/etc/motd
rm -f ${TEMPROOT}/etc/hosts ${TEMPROOT}/etc/hosts.allow
rm -f ${TEMPROOT}/etc/mail/mailer.conf
rm -f ${TEMPROOT}/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
rm -f ${TEMPROOT}/etc/namedb/PROTO.*
${TEMPROOT}/etc/namedb/named.* \
${TEMPROOT}/etc/namedb/make-localhost
;;
esac
ARGH!!!!! That must be it. Deleting them in TEMPROOT causes them to go
away in /var/named?
Thanks for the insight. Now, is what I did here wrong or is this an
issue with the way things are moved around?
Cheers,
Sean
--=-ANEL331J2eKLLfYzwRJC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBBZdKOyQsGN30uGE4RAg5pAKDPOa20U/R5eyzKt4kRKytPv9kvPQCcDdkA
CqtizxIEF6OYfHTzpcMHni4=
=yzCC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-ANEL331J2eKLLfYzwRJC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1097192078.1794.6.camel>