Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:39:31 -0500 From: Julio Capote <jcapote@gmail.com> To: Frode Nordahl <frode@nordahl.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status Message-ID: <1108053571.658.7.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> In-Reply-To: <0871e2875ca281ce68b516839e70ea5d@nordahl.net> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net> <a823b8bea2796c3403095613740a536d@nordahl.net> <20050210101554.GD16892@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <16907.32279.631287.579323@roam.psg.com> <0871e2875ca281ce68b516839e70ea5d@nordahl.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I upgraded to 5-STABLE + ULE + PREEMPT last night, been using my desktop system heavily for about 6 hours, and no crashing, AWESOME performance under heavy load. Im curious to see some 1(O) vs ULE benches.. On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:00 +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote: > On Feb 10, 2005, at 16:30, Randy Bush wrote: > > how about stability? last time i tried ule, the system died in > > a few days. > > Don't know yet. > > I will keep trashing the server and post here if it crashes. > > > Regards, > Frode Nordahl > > > randy > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1108053571.658.7.camel>