Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:29:44 +0100 From: Thomas Gravgaard <fehaar@infopaq.dk> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: cvsup-16-f issue Message-ID: <1137F4C2EFF6D111B2330060B03C89D601C8E9D7@REDSRV>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a=20 > cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will=20 > run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version=20 > won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly=20 > reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't=20 > have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO. IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in = the Makefile because the default behaviour would run on systems with an = without X11. Since I only run boxes without X11 it would conveniently make my life easier too.... But thats another story :) +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | | Infopaq ApS | Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple \/ \ ^| | fehaar@infopaq.dk | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)| +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FC K=F8benhavn. Danske mestre 2000/2001! = | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ = To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1137F4C2EFF6D111B2330060B03C89D601C8E9D7>