Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 May 2007 14:55:23 -0400
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        x11@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ImageMagick bump
Message-ID:  <1178391323.55607.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070505185138.GA21388@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20070505170012.GA62735@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389743.55607.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505183147.GA20810@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389962.55607.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505185138.GA21388@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-XTr7sKEuUXzpAqfV8egt
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get bum=
ped,
> > > > > can you confirm?
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on
> > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (otherwis=
e
> > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files agai=
n)
> > > >=20
> > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not.  There =
are
> > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional disa=
bled
> > > > dependency.  I will recheck my script to see why some ports were no=
t
> > > > bumped.
> > >=20
> > > Thanks!
> >=20
> > I found the problem.  My script didn't take DISTVERSION into account.  =
I
> > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly.
>=20
> Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if
> possible...flz?

That would be very hard to generate at this point.  I mean, it would be
trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been
bumped.  Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list.

Joe

--=20
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome

--=-XTr7sKEuUXzpAqfV8egt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGPNMab2iPiv4Uz4cRApN4AJ9EoGpDGMkDT14VzCN15wyid2BZkgCfRyYu
Aa/n+Jh0XUDYitB4p2y6RDo=
=Ojxy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-XTr7sKEuUXzpAqfV8egt--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1178391323.55607.13.camel>