Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:47:53 -0500 From: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin.k@gmail.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: powerd algorithms enhancements Message-ID: <1226065673.1210.9.camel@RabbitsDen> In-Reply-To: <20081107033524.A70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <491208D3.2050901@FreeBSD.org> <20081107033524.A70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 16:20 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > sam's concerns seem tied in with the same kernel > cpu freq setting stuff, so I gather all that is connected long term .. Just to make sure all facts are spelled out: I have had reliable livelocks with ath + powerd on RELENG_7 with HAL 0.9.x.x. I have not seen single livelock since pulling HAL 0.10.5.10 in from -CURRENT. So ath is not that lily-white in that regard either. -- Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1226065673.1210.9.camel>